Treasury News Network

Learn & Share the latest News & Analysis in Corporate Treasury

  1. Home
  2. Cash & Liquidity Management
  3. Cash Concentration

Global cash pooling and sweeping tips and insights from ACT’s Cash Management Conference panel discu

At the Association of Corporate Treasurers Cash Management in London last week a panel made up of Maurice Cleaves - Barclays, Ian Armstrong - AMEC, Angela Clark - Misys, and Paul Outridge - De La Rue and the audience generated some useful tips and insights into the current state of play in global cash pooling and sweeping:

  • the majority of the audience (39%) use a combination of pooling and ZBA sweeping
  • De La Rue uses a combination of sweeping and then netting the balance of their USD and GBP while  Amec sweeps all cash back to UK with no pooling
  • notional pools are easier to manage but involve complex documentation, which can make them impractical
  •  audience thought the factors most important in deciding whether and how to sweep and pool were:
    • regulations and tax: 49%
    • getting buy-in of local business units: 17%
    • counter-party risk: 9%
    • country risk: 16%
    • documentation: 8%
  • beware of trying to use pooling and sweeping in situations, where thethis moment sums and savings are too small or just too complex when a simple sweep occasionally would be far more effective
  • the administrative savings in the corporate treasury department from an automated sweeping/pooling system are a major reason for setting up such systems, e.g. De La Rue have reduced the management of their sweeping and pooling arrangement to just one hour/day
  • other reasons for NOT using pooling are:
    • complexity and the current low % environment
    • use automated sweeping to remove cash balances from certain countries
    • only small amounts and banks charges are prohibitive
  • is there a trade off between full % and partial % set-off?
    • full % set-off and cross guarantees is worth it
    • ⁃we avoid partial off-set, not worth it
  • none of the panel and the audience appeared to have incorporated the potential pooling and sweeping benefits of SEPA into their solutions
  • savings from the panelists' sweeping and pooling solutions are significant:
    • Amec: 150 bps and significant administration savings
    • Misys: reduced working capital by $10m
    • De La Rue: saved $10m and administrative savings.

Like this item? Get our Weekly Update newsletter. Subscribe today

Add a comment

New comment submissions are moderated.