Home » Operations » Best Practices & Benchmarking in Operations

Tax strategy rethink needed as BEPS gains traction

Progress is gathering pace for the OECD's Base Erosion and Profit-shifting (BEPS) initiative. What are the latest developments and what will the role of corporate treasury be in planning for changes to corporate tax strategy?

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has now released all the key instruments needed for its BEPS initiative (namely: the BEPS reports, Transfer Pricing Guidelines and the Multilateral Instrument/MLI) and two-thirds of companies are already actively preparing to comply, according to a survey conducted by Thomson Reuters last August. Now that the EU and other countries are legislating and providing more clarity on how they will implement BEPS, it's a good time for companies to take stock and consider how their operations and tax strategy might change.

Latest BEPS developments

A 2016 year-end review by EY points out some of the most recent developments:

  • In October 2016, the European Commission announced a new package of corporate tax reforms, which included the common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB), a directive on double taxation dispute resolution mechanisms and amendments to the anti-tax avoidance directive (ATAD).
  • As of the beginning of 2017, nearly 100 countries have committed to the implementation of BEPS through their membership of the Inclusive Framework on BEPS Implementation. Many countries have begun to implement some of the recommendations made in the BEPS report.
  • In November 2016, the Multilateral Instrument (MLI) was published – an instrument that changes the way bilateral tax treaties are updated and facilitate the implementation of BEPS changes into treaties as quickly as possible. (Of the 15 action points initially proposed to establish a BEPS framework, the MLI was the last point – see the graph below showing all 15 actions based around three pillars of coherence, substance and transparency).

15 actions for BEPS

Corporate treasury will play key role in identifying income

According to EY's Zachary John, writing in Treasury&Risk, the BEPS project is now setting recommended minimum standards for these 15 actions and has completed standards for actions 5, 6, 13 and 14.

Some of the BEPS actions will mean that multinationals have to seriously rethink their organisational and fiscal structures and action 13 – re-examine transfer pricing documentation and country-by-country reporting – will in particular require expertise from corporate treasury. EY's John writes: “... as country-by-country reporting is adopted in participating countries, corporate treasurers will have to assist the tax function in identifying income, whether through the implementation or modification of technology or redesign of a process that may not capture the level of detail required.”

John adds: “Tax departments should consider a change in how they report income in all the affected tax jurisdictions, and they will likely lean on treasury to supply income and revenue information by country, as well as information about any applicable transfer pricing.”

For more insight into what corporate treasury needs to do about BEPS, see this original CTMfile WEBchat with PwC’s tax partner, Graham Robinson: BEPS - the impact on corporate treasury and how to respond around the world


This item appears in the following sections:
Operations
Best Practices & Benchmarking in Operations
Control & Compliance in Operations
Operational Risk Management

Also see

Comments

No comment yet, why not be the first?

Add a comment